|
| (1) | Some think they describe the temple at Jerusalem prior to the Babylonian captivity, and are designed to preserve a memorial of it. But the objection is that such a memorial is unnecessary because of the records in Kings and Chronicles, while the description is untrue, because in many particulars it does not agree with that in the books named. |
| (2) | Some think these chapters describe the temple in Jerusalem after the return from the seventy hears in Babylon, but this cannot be, because there are more marks of contrast than likeness between the temple here described and that. |
| (3) | Some think they describe the ideal temple which the Jews should have built after the seventy years' return, and which they never realized. But this lowers the character of the divine Word. Why should this prophecy in Ezekiel have been given, if it was never to be fulfilled? |
| (4) | Some think this temple in Ezekiel symbolizes the spiritual blessings of the church in the present age. But this appears unlikely, because even those who hold the theory can not explain the symbolism of which they speak. Moreover, even as symbolism, it leaves out several important features of Christianity, such as the atonement and intercession of the high priest. |
| (5) | The last view is that in the preceding comments, that we have here a prediction of the temple that shall be built in the millennial age. This appears a fitting and intelligent sequel to the preceding prophecies. |
To be continued. Final part next week.
Comments or Questions?
Geoff
GKragen@aol.com
http://www.cfdevotionals.org